🔗 Share this article

As dawn illuminated the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, representatives remained confined in a airless conference room, unaware whether it was day or night. Having spent 12 hours in strained discussions, with dozens ministers representing multiple blocs of countries including the least developed nations to the most developed economies.

Frustration mounted, the air thick as weary delegates faced up to the sobering reality: there would not be a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The international climate negotiations faced the brink of abject failure.

The central impasse: Fossil fuels

Research has demonstrated for nearly a century, the greenhouse gases produced by utilizing fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to dangerous levels.

Nevertheless, during nearly three decades of annual climate meetings, the crucial requirement to halt fossil fuel use has been addressed only once – in a decision made two years ago at Cop28 to "transition away from fossil fuels". Representatives from the Gulf states, Russia, and a few other countries were adamant this would not be repeated.

Mounting support for change

Simultaneously, a expanding group of countries were equally determined that advancement on this issue was vitally needed. They had created a initiative that was attracting growing support and made it evident they were prepared to hold firm.

Emerging economies strongly sought to advance on securing funding support to help them manage the already disastrous impacts of extreme weather.

Critical moment

During the night of Saturday, some delegates were prepared to walk out and cause breakdown. "It was on the edge for us," stated one national delegate. "I was ready to walk away."

The critical development happened through talks with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, principal delegates left the main group to hold a private conversation with the lead Saudi negotiator. They encouraged language that would obliquely recognise the global commitment to "transition away from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Surprising consensus

As opposed to explicitly mentioning fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the Dubai agreement". Upon deliberation, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly approved the wording.

Participants expressed relief. Applause rang out. The settlement was completed.

With what became known as the "Belém political package", the world took another small step towards the phaseout of fossil fuels – a faltering, insufficient step that will scarcely affect the climate's ongoing trajectory towards catastrophe. But nevertheless a important shift from total inaction.

Major components of the agreement

• Alongside the oblique commitment in the official document, countries will commence creating a roadmap to gradually eliminate fossil fuels
• This will be primarily a non-binding program led by Brazil that will deliver findings next year
• Addressing the required reductions in greenhouse gas emissions to not exceed the 1.5C limit was also put off to next year
• Developing countries achieved a significant expansion to $120bn of annual finance to help them cope with the impacts of climate disasters
• This sum will not be fully available until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "just transition mechanism" to help people working in fossil fuel sectors move toward the renewable industry

Differing opinions

With global conditions teeters on the brink of climate "tipping points" that could destroy ecosystems and plunge whole regions into chaos, the agreement was far from the "significant advancement" needed.

"Negotiators delivered some small advances in the correct path, but given the severity of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," cautioned one environmental analyst.

This imperfect deal might have been all that was possible, given the geopolitical headwinds – including a Washington administration who ignored the talks and remains aligned with oil and coal, the rising tide of rightwing populism, continuing wars in different locations, unacceptable degrees of inequality, and global economic uncertainty.

"Major polluters – the oil and gas companies – were at last in the focus at the climate summit," comments one climate activist. "We have crossed a threshold on that. The political space is open. Now we must convert it to a actual pathway to a more secure planet."

Major disagreements revealed

While nations were able to welcome the gavelling through of the deal, Cop30 also exposed deep fissures in the sole international mechanism for addressing the climate crisis.

"International summits are unanimity-required, and in a time of international tensions, agreement is progressively challenging to reach," observed one international diplomat. "It would be dishonest to claim that this summit has achieved complete success that is needed. The difference between where we are and what science demands remains concerningly substantial."

If the world is to avoid the gravest consequences of climate crisis, the international negotiations alone will prove insufficient.